nips nips2005 nips2005-130 nips2005-130-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Lei Zhang, Dimitris Samaras, Nelly Alia-klein, Nora Volkow, Rita Goldstein
Abstract: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) has enabled scientists to look into the active brain. However, interactivity between functional brain regions, is still little studied. In this paper, we contribute a novel framework for modeling the interactions between multiple active brain regions, using Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) as generative models for brain activation patterns. This framework is applied to modeling of neuronal circuits associated with reward. The novelty of our framework from a Machine Learning perspective lies in the use of DBNs to reveal the brain connectivity and interactivity. Such interactivity models which are derived from fMRI data are then validated through a group classification task. We employ and compare four different types of DBNs: Parallel Hidden Markov Models, Coupled Hidden Markov Models, Fully-linked Hidden Markov Models and Dynamically MultiLinked HMMs (DML-HMM). Moreover, we propose and compare two schemes of learning DML-HMMs. Experimental results show that by using DBNs, group classification can be performed even if the DBNs are constructed from as few as 5 brain regions. We also demonstrate that, by using the proposed learning algorithms, different DBN structures characterize drug addicted subjects vs. control subjects. This finding provides an independent test for the effect of psychopathology on brain function. In general, we demonstrate that incorporation of computer science principles into functional neuroimaging clinical studies provides a novel approach for probing human brain function.
[1] S. Anders, M. Lotze, M. Erb, W. Grodd, and N. Birbaumer. Brain activity underlying emotional valence and arousal: A response-related fmri study. In Human Brain Mapping.
[2] M. Brand, N. Oliver, and A. Pentland. Coupled hidden markov models for complex action recognition. In CVPR, pages 994–999, 1996.
[3] J. Ford, H. Farid, F. Makedon, L.A. Flashman, T.W. McAllister, V. Megalooikonomou, and A.J. Saykin. Patient classification of fmri activation maps. In MICCAI, 2003.
[4] N. Friedman. The bayesian structual algorithm. In UAI, 1998.
[5] N. Friedman, K. Murphy, and S. Russell. Learning the structure of dynamic probabilistic networks. In Uncertainty in AI, pages 139–147, 1998.
[6] K. Friston, A. Holmes, K. Worsley, and et al. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping, pages 2:189–210, 1995.
[7] G. Ghahramani. Learning dynamic bayesian networks. In Adaptive Processing of Sequences and Data Structures, Lecture Notes in AI, pages 168–197, 1998.
[8] R.Z. Goldstein and N.D. Volkow. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: Neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry, (10):1642–1652.
[9] R.Z. Goldstein et al. A modified role for the orbitofrontal cortex in attribution of salience to monetary reward in cocaine addiction: an fmri study at 4t. In Human Brain Mapping Conference, 2004.
[10] S. Gong and T. Xiang. Recognition of group activities using dynamic probabilistic networks. In ICCV, 2003.
[11] M.I. Jordan and Y. Weiss. Graphical models: probabilistic inference, Arbib, M. (ed): Handbook of Neural Networks and Brain Theory. MIT Press, 2002.
[12] A.W. MacDonald et al. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288(5472):1835–1838, 2000.
[13] T.M. Mitchell, R. Hutchinson, R. Niculescu, F. Pereira, X. Wang, M. Just, and S. Newman. Learning to decode cognitive states from brain images. Machine Learning, 57:145–175, 2004.
[14] K.P. Murphy. An introduction to graphical models. 2001.
[15] L.K. Hansen P. Hojen-Sorensen and C.E. Rasmussen. Bayesian modeling of fmri time series. In NIPS, 1999.
[16] W.D. Penny, K.E. Stephan, A. Mechelli, and K.J. Friston. Comparing dynamic causal models. NeuroImage, 22(3):1157–1172, 2004.
[17] C. Vogler and D. Metaxas. A framework for recognizing the simultaneous aspects of american sign language. In CVIU, pages 81:358–384, 2001.
[18] X. Wang, R. Hutchinson, and T.M. Mitchell. Training fmri classifiers to detect cognitive states across multiple human subjects. In NIPS03, Dec 2003.
[19] L. Zhang, D. Samaras, D. Tomasi, N. Volkow, and R. Goldstein. Machine learning for clinical diagnosis from functional magnetic resonance imaging. In CVPR, 2005.