nips nips2005 nips2005-28 nips2005-28-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Inna Weiner, Tomer Hertz, Israel Nelken, Daphna Weinshall
Abstract: We present a novel approach to the characterization of complex sensory neurons. One of the main goals of characterizing sensory neurons is to characterize dimensions in stimulus space to which the neurons are highly sensitive (causing large gradients in the neural responses) or alternatively dimensions in stimulus space to which the neuronal response are invariant (defining iso-response manifolds). We formulate this problem as that of learning a geometry on stimulus space that is compatible with the neural responses: the distance between stimuli should be large when the responses they evoke are very different, and small when the responses they evoke are similar. Here we show how to successfully train such distance functions using rather limited amount of information. The data consisted of the responses of neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1) of anesthetized cats to 32 stimuli derived from natural sounds. For each neuron, a subset of all pairs of stimuli was selected such that the responses of the two stimuli in a pair were either very similar or very dissimilar. The distance function was trained to fit these constraints. The resulting distance functions generalized to predict the distances between the responses of a test stimulus and the trained stimuli. 1
[1] O. Bar-Yosef, Y. Rotman, and I. Nelken. Responses of Neurons in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex to Bird Chirps: Effects of Temporal and Spectral Context. J. Neurosci., 22(19):8619–8632, 2002.
[2] D. T. Blake and M. M. Merzenich. Changes of AI Receptive Fields With Sound Density. J Neurophysiol, 88(6):3409–3420, 2002.
[3] G. Chechik, A. Globerson, M.J. Anderson, E.D. Young, I. Nelken, and N. Tishby. Group redundancy measures reveal redundancy reduction in the auditory pathway. In NIPS, 2002.
[4] R. C. deCharms, D. T. Blake, and M. M. Merzenich. 280(5368):1439–1444, 1998. Optimizing Sound Features for Cortical Neurons. Science,
[5] D. A. Depireux, J. Z. Simon, D. J. Klein, and S. A. Shamma. Spectro-Temporal Response Field Characterization With Dynamic Ripples in Ferret Primary Auditory Cortex. J Neurophysiol, 85(3):1220–1234, 2001.
[6] J. J. Eggermont, P. M. Johannesma, and A. M. Aertsen. Reverse-correlation methods in auditory research. Q Rev Biophys., 16(3):341–414, 1983.
[7] T. Hertz, A. Bar-Hillel, and D. Weinshall. Boosting margin based distance functions for clustering. In ICML, 2004.
[8] N. Kowalski, D. A. Depireux, and S. A. Shamma. Analysis of dynamic spectra in ferret primary auditory cortex. I. Characteristics of single-unit responses to moving ripple spectra. J Neurophysiol, 76(5):3503–3523, 1996.
[9] L. Las, E. A. Stern, and I. Nelken. Representation of Tone in Fluctuating Maskers in the Ascending Auditory System. J. Neurosci., 25(6):1503–1513, 2005.
[10] C. K. Machens, M. S. Wehr, and A. M. Zador. Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds. J. Neurosci., 24(5):1089–1100, 2004.
[11] L. M. Miller, M. A. Escabi, H. L. Read, and C. E. Schreiner. Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Lemniscal Auditory Thalamus and Cortex. J Neurophysiol, 87(1):516–527, 2002.
[12] I. Nelken. Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(4):474–480, 2004.
[13] Y. Rotman, O. Bar-Yosef, and I. Nelken. Relating cluster and population responses to natural sounds and tonal stimuli in cat primary auditory cortex. Hearing Research, 152(1-2):110–127, 2001.
[14] M. Sahani and J. F. Linden. How linear are auditory cortical responses? In NIPS, 2003.
[15] N. Shental, A. Bar-Hilel, T. Hertz, and D. Weinshall. Computing Gaussian mixture models with EM using equivalence constraints. In NIPS, 2003.
[16] F. E. Theunissen, K. Sen, and A. J. Doupe. Spectral-Temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds. J. Neurosci., 20(6):2315–2331, 2000.
[17] C. Yanover and T. Hertz. Predicting protein-peptide binding affinity by learning peptide-peptide distance functions. In RECOMB, 2005.