nips nips2003 nips2003-85 nips2003-85-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Fang Fang, Daniel Kersten, Paul R. Schrater, Alan L. Yuille
Abstract: This paper compares the ability of human observers to detect target image curves with that of an ideal observer. The target curves are sampled from a generative model which specifies (probabilistically) the geometry and local intensity properties of the curve. The ideal observer performs Bayesian inference on the generative model using MAP estimation. Varying the probability model for the curve geometry enables us investigate whether human performance is best for target curves that obey specific shape statistics, in particular those observed on natural shapes. Experiments are performed with data on both rectangular and hexagonal lattices. Our results show that human observers’ performance approaches that of the ideal observer and are, in general, closest to the ideal for conditions where the target curve tends to be straight or similar to natural statistics on curves. This suggests a bias of human observers towards straight curves and natural statistics.
[1] Brady, M. J. (1999). Psychophysical investigations of incomplete forms and forms with background. Ph. D., University of Minnesota.
[2] Elder J.H. and Goldberg R.M.. Ecological Statistics of Gestalt Laws for the Perceptual Organization of Contours. Journal of Vision, 2, 324-353. 2002.
[3] Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local “association field”. Vision Res, 33, (2), 173-93. 1993.
[4] Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. The roles of polarity and symmetry in the perceptual grouping of contour fragments. Spat Vis, 13, (1), 51-66.2000.
[5] Geisler W.S. , Perry J.S. , Super B.J. and Gallogly D.P. . Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Res, 41, (6), 711-24. 2001.
[6] Geman D. and Jedynak B. . “An active testing model for tracking roads from satellite images”. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 18, 1-14, 1996.
[7] Hess, R., & Field, D. . Integration of contours: new insights. Trends Cogn Sci, 3, (12), 480486.1999.
[8] Kovacs, I., & Julesz, B. A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 90, (16), 7495-7. 1993.
[9] Lee A.B., Huang J.G., and Mumford D.B., “Random collage model for natural images”, Int’l J. of Computer Vision, Oct. 2000.
[10] Ren X. and Malik J. . “A Probabilistic Multi-scale Model for Contour Completion Based on Image Statistics”. In Proceedings ECCV. 2002
[11] Ruderman D.L. and Bialek W. , “Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods”, Phy. Rev. Letter, 73:814-817, 1994.
[12] Sigman, M., Cecchi, G. A., Gilbert, C. D., & Magnasco, M. O. . On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 98, (4), 1935-40. 2001.
[13] Wainwright M.J. and Simoncelli E.P., “Scale mixtures of Gaussian and the statistics of natural images”, NIPS, 855-861, 2000.
[14] Yuille A.L. and Coughlan J.M. . “Fundamental Limits of Bayesian Inference: Order Parameters and Phase Transitions for Road Tracking” . IEEE PAMI. Vol. 22. No. 2. February. 2000.
[15] Yuille A.L. , Coughlan J.M., Wu Y-N. and Zhu S.C. . “Order Parameters for Minimax Entropy Distributions: When does high level knowledge help?” IJCV. 41(1/2), pp 9-33. 2001.
[16] Zhu S.C. . “Embedding Gestalt Laws in Markov Random Fields – A theory for shape modeling and perceptual organization”. IEEE PAMI, Vol. 21, No.11, pp1170-1187, Nov, 1999.