nips nips2001 nips2001-17 nips2001-17-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

17 nips-2001-A Quantitative Model of Counterfactual Reasoning


Source: pdf

Author: Daniel Yarlett, Michael Ramscar

Abstract: In this paper we explore two quantitative approaches to the modelling of counterfactual reasoning – a linear and a noisy-OR model – based on information contained in conceptual dependency networks. Empirical data is acquired in a study and the fit of the models compared to it. We conclude by considering the appropriateness of non-parametric approaches to counterfactual reasoning, and examining the prospects for other parametric approaches in the future.


reference text

[1] Byrne R.M.J. and Tasso A. (1999). Counterfactual Reasoning with Factual, Possible, and Counterfactual Conditionals, Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 726-740.

[2] Dawes R.M. (1979). The Robust Beauty of Improper Linear Models in Decision Making, American Psychologist, 34, 571-582.

[3] Goodman N. (1983; 4th edition). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

[4] Griffiths T. (August 2001). Assessing Interventions in Linear Belief Networks.

[5] Kahneman D. and Miller D.T. (1986). Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to its Alternatives, Psychological Review, 93(2), 136-153.

[6] Kahneman D., Slovic P. and Tversky A. (1982; eds.). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

[7] Kelley H.H. (1972). Causal Schemata and the Attribution Process. In Jones, Kanouse, Kelley, Nisbett, Valins and Weiners (eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, Chapter 9, 151174, General Learning Press, Morristown, New Jersey.

[8] Lewis D.K. (1973). Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

[9] Murphy K.P., Weiss Y. and Jordan M.I. (1999). Loopy Belief Propagation for Approximate Inference: An Empirical Study, Proceedings of Uncertainty in AI, 467-475.

[10] Pearl J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California.

[11] Pearl J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[12] Roese N.J. (1997). Counterfactual Thinking, Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.

[13] Sloman S., Love B.C. and Ahn W.K. (1998). Feature Centrality and Conceptual Coherence, Cognitive Science, 22(2), 189-228.

[14] Yarlett D.G. and Ramscar M.J.A. (2001). Structural Determinants of Counterfactual Reasoning, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1154-1159.

[15] Yarlett D.G. and Ramscar M.J.A. (in preparation). Uncertainty in Causal and Counterfactual Inference.