jmlr jmlr2012 jmlr2012-24 jmlr2012-24-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Roland R. Ramsahai
Abstract: Conditional independence relations involving latent variables do not necessarily imply observable independences. They may imply inequality constraints on observable parameters and causal bounds, which can be used for falsification and identification. The literature on computing such constraints often involve a deterministic underlying data generating process in a counterfactual framework. If an analyst is ignorant of the nature of the underlying mechanisms then they may wish to use a model which allows the underlying mechanisms to be probabilistic. A method of computation for a weaker model without any determinism is given here and demonstrated for the instrumental variable model, though applicable to other models. The approach is based on the analysis of mappings with convex polytopes in a decision theoretic framework and can be implemented in readily available polyhedral computation software. Well known constraints and bounds are replicated in a probabilistic model and novel ones are computed for instrumental variable models without non-deterministic versions of the randomization, exclusion restriction and monotonicity assumptions respectively. Keywords: instrumental variables, instrumental inequality, causal bounds, convex polytope, latent variables, directed acyclic graph
O. O. Aalen and A. Frigessi. What can statistics contribute to a causal understanding? Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 34(1):155–168, 2007. 845 R AMSAHAI J. D. Angrist, G. W. Imbens and D. B. Rubin. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 91(434):444–455, 1996. A. Balke. Probabilistic counterfactuals: semantics, computation and applications. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1995. A. Balke and J. Pearl. Non-parametric bounds on causal effects from partial compliance data. Technical Report R-199, Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, 1993. A. Balke and J. Pearl. Bounds on treatment effects from studies with imperfect compliance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(439):1171–1176, 1997. Z. Cai, M. Kuroki, J. Pearl and J. Tian. Bounds on direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables. Biometrics, 64(3):695–701, 2008. T. Christof and A. Loebel. PORTA. Available online at URL: http://www.iwr.uniheidelberg.de/groups/comopt/software/PORTA/, 1998. A. P. Dawid. Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statisitical Society, Ser. B, 41(1):1–31, 1979. A. P. Dawid. Causal inference without counterfactuals (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(450):407–448, 2000. A. P. Dawid. Influence diagrams for causal modelling and inference. International Statistical Review, 70(2):161–189, 2002. A. P. Dawid. Causal inference using influence diagrams: the problem of partial compliance. In P. J. Green, N. L. Hjort and S. Richardson, editors, Highly Structured Stochastic Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003. A. P. Dawid and V. Didelez. Identifying the consequences of dynamic treatment strategies: a decision theoretic overview. Statistics Surveys, 4:184–231, 2010. V. Didelez, A. P. Dawid and S. Geneletti. Direct and indirect effects of sequential treatments. In Proceedings of the Twenty Second Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 138–146, AUAI Press, Arlington, Virginia, 2006. V. Didelez and N. Sheehan. Mendelian randomisation as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16(4):309–330, 2007. J. Durbin. Errors in variables. Review of the International Statistical Institute, 22(1):23–32, 1954. B. Efron and D. Feldman. Compliance as an explanatory variable in clinical trials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86(413):9–26, 1991. E. Gawrilow and M. Joswig. Polymake: a framework for analyzing convex polytopes. In G. Kalai and G. M. Ziegler, editors, Polytopes - Combinatorics and Computation, Birkh¨ user, Basel, 2000. a Available online at URL: http://wwwopt.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/polymake/doku.php. 846 C ONSTRAINTS FOR N ON - DETERMINISTIC M ODELS D. Geiger and C. Meek. Graphical models and exponential families. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 156–165, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California, 1998. S. Geneletti. Identifying direct and indirect effects in a non-counterfactual framework. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 69(2):199–215, 2007. M. Goldszmidt and J. Pearl. Rank based systems: a simple approach to belief revision, belief update, and reasoning about evidence and actions. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California, 1992. D. Heckerman and R. Shachter. Decision theoretic foundations for causal reasoning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 3:405–430, 1995. K. Hirano, G. W. Imbens, D. B. Rubin and X.-H. Zhou. Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design. Biostatistics, 1(1):69–88, 2000. G. W. Imbens and J. D. Angrist. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62(2):467–475, 1994. C. Kang and J. Tian. Inequality constraints in causal models with hidden variables. In Proceedings of the Twenty Second Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 233– 240, AUAI Press, Arlington, Virginia, 2006. S. Kaufman, J. S. Kaufman and R. F. MacLehose. Analytic bounds on causal risk difference in directed acyclic graphs involving three observed binary variables. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139(10):3473–3487, 2009. S. L. Lauritzen. Graphical models. Oxford University Press, Clarendon, Oxford, UK, 1996. S. L. Lauritzen. Causal inference from graphical models. In O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, D. R. Cox and C. Kl¨ ppelberg, editors, Complex Stochastic Systems, CRC Press, London, 2001. u S. L. Lauritzen. Discussion on causality. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 31(2):189–201, 2004. S. L. Lauritzen, A. P. Dawid, B. N. Larsen and H. G. Leimer. Independence properties of directed Markov fields. Networks, 20(5):491–505, 1990. Lipid Research Clinic Program. The lipid research clinics coronary primary prevention trial results, part I and II. Journal of the American Medical Association, 251(3):351–374, 1984. C. F. Manski. Non-parametric bounds on treatment effects. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 80(2):319–323, 1990. J. Pearl. Comment: graphical models, causality and interventions. Statistical Science, 8(3):266– 269, 1993. J. Pearl. Causal inference from indirect experiments. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 7(6):561– 582, 1995. 847 R AMSAHAI J. Pearl. Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 411–420, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California, 2001. R. R. Ramsahai. Causal bounds and instruments. In Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 310–317, AUAI Press, Corvallis, Oregon, 2007. R. R. Ramsahai and S. L. Lauritzen. Likelihood analysis of the binary instrumental variable model. Biometrika, 98(4):987–994, 2011. T. S. Richardson and J. M. Robins. Analysis of the binary instrumental variable model. In R. Dechter, H. Geffner and J. Y. Halpern, editors, Heuristics, probability and causality: a tribute to Judea Pearl, College Publications, UK, 2010. J. M. Robins. The analysis of randomized and non-randomized AIDS treatment trials using a new approach to causal inference in logitudinal studies. In L. Sechrest, H. Freeman and A. Mulley, editors, Health Service Research Methodology: a Focus on AIDS, U.S. Public Health Service, Washington D.C., 1989. J.M. Robins and S. Greenland. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology, 3(2):143–155, 1992. J. M. Robins and T. S. Richardson. Alternative graphical causal models and the identification of direct effects. In P. Shrout, editor, Causality and Psychopathology: Finding the Determinants of Disorders and Their Cures, Oxford University Press, 2010. D. B. Rubin. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5):688–701, 1974. B. E. Shepherd, P. B. Gilbert, Y. Jemiai and A. Rotnitzky. Sensitivity analyses comparing outcomes only existing in a subset selected post randomization, conditional on covariates, with application to HIV vaccine trial. Biometrics, 62(2):332–342, 2006. A. Sj¨ lander. Bounds on natural direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables. o Statistics in Medicine, 28(4):558–571, 2009. A. Sommer and S. L. Zeger. On estimating efficacy from clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 10(1):45–52, 1991. P. Spirtes, C. Glymour and R. Scheines. Causation, Prediction and Search. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993. R. H. Strotz and H. O. A. Wold. Recursive vs non-recursive systems: an attempt at synthesis (part I of a triptych on causal chain systems). Econometrica, 28(2):417–427, 1960. T. Verma and J. Pearl. Causal networks: semantics and expressiveness. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 352-359, Elsevier Science, New York, 1988. 848