cvpr cvpr2013 cvpr2013-342 cvpr2013-342-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

342 cvpr-2013-Prostate Segmentation in CT Images via Spatial-Constrained Transductive Lasso


Source: pdf

Author: Yinghuan Shi, Shu Liao, Yaozong Gao, Daoqiang Zhang, Yang Gao, Dinggang Shen

Abstract: Accurate prostate segmentation in CT images is a significant yet challenging task for image guided radiotherapy. In this paper, a novel semi-automated prostate segmentation method is presented. Specifically, to segment the prostate in the current treatment image, the physician first takes a few seconds to manually specify the first and last slices of the prostate in the image space. Then, the prostate is segmented automatically by theproposed two steps: (i) Thefirst step of prostate-likelihood estimation to predict the prostate likelihood for each voxel in the current treatment image, aiming to generate the 3-D prostate-likelihood map by the proposed Spatial-COnstrained Transductive LassO (SCOTO); (ii) The second step of multi-atlases based label fusion to generate the final segmentation result by using the prostate shape information obtained from the planning and previous treatment images. The experimental result shows that the proposed method outperforms several state-of-the-art methods on prostate segmentation in a real prostate CT dataset, consisting of 24 patients with 330 images. Moreover, it is also clinically feasible since our method just requires the physician to spend a few seconds on manual specification of the first and last slices of the prostate.


reference text

[1] Prostate Cancer, report from National Cancer Institute. link: http : / /www . cancer .gov/ cancert opi c s /type s /pro st at e.

[2] A. Beck and M. Teboulle. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J. Img. Sci., 2(1): 183–202, 2009.

[3] M. Belkin, P. Niyogi, and V. Sindhwani. Manifold regularization: a geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. JMLR, 7:2399– 2434, 2006.

[4] T. Chan, S. Esedoglu, and M. Nikolov. Algorithms for finding global minimizers of image segmentation and denoising models. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 66: 1632–1648, 2006.

[5] C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. Libsvm : a library for support vector machines. ACM TIST, 2: 1–27, 2011.

[6] S. Chen, D. Lovelock, and R. Radke. Segmenting the prostate and rectum in CT imagery using anatomical constraints. Medical Image Analysis, 15: 1–1 1, 2011.

[7] T. Chen, S. Kim, J. Zhou, D. Metaxas, G. Rajagopal, and N. Yue. 3D meshless prostate segmentation and registration in image guided radiotherapy. In MICCAI, pages 43–50, 2009.

[8] N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, pages 886–893, 2005.

[9] B. Davis, M. Foskey, J. Rosenman, L. Goyal, S. Chang, and S. Joshi. Automatic segmentation of intra-treatment CT images for adaptive radiation therapy of the prostate. In MICCAI, pages 442–450, 2005.

[10] B. Efron, I. Johnstone, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Least angle regression. Annals of Statistics, 32:407–499, 2003.

[11] Q. Feng, M. Foskey, W. Chen, and D. Shen. Segmenting CT prostate images using population and patient-specific statistics for radiotherapy. Medical Physics, 37:4121–4132, 2010.

[12] Y. Gao, R. Sandhu, G. Fichtinger, and A. Tannenbaum. A coupled global registration and segmentation framework with application to magnetic resonance prostate imagery. IEEE TMI, 29: 1781–1794, 2010.

[13] T. Langerak et al. Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE). IEEE TMI, 29:2000–2008, 2010.

[14] W. Li, S. Liao, Q. Feng, W. Chen, and D. Shen. Learning image context for segmentation of prostate in CT-guided radiotherapy. In MICCAI, pages 570– 578, 2011.

[15] S. Liao and D. Shen. A feature based learning framework for accurate prostate localization in CT images. IEEE TIP, 21:3546–3559, 2012.

[16] C. Lu, Y. Zheng, N. Birkbeck, J. Zhang, T. Kohlberger, C. Tietjen, T. Boettger, J. Duncan, and S. Zhou. Precise segmentation of multiple organs in ct volumes using learning-based approach and information theory. In MICCAI, pages 462– 469, 2012.

[17] Z. Luo and P. Tseng. On the convergence of the coordinate descent method for convex differentiable minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 72(1):7–35, 1992.

[18] G. Mallat. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE TPAMI, 11:674–693, 1989.

[19] G. Mallat. Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of maxdependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE TPAMI, 27: 1226– 1238, 2005.

[20] T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE TPAMI, 24:971–987, 2002.

[21] Y. Shi et al. Transductive prostate segmentation for CT image guided radiotherapy. In MICCAI workshop: Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, pages 1–9, 2012.

[22] R. Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. JRSSB, 58:267– 288, 1996.

[23] R. Tibshirani, M. Saunders, S. Rosset, J. Zhu, and K. Knight. Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. JRSSB, 67:91–108, 2005.

[24] Z. Tu and X. Bai. Auto-context and its application to high-level vision tasks and 3D brain image segmentation. IEEE TPAMI, 32: 1744–1757, 2010.

[25] Y. Zhan et al. Targeted prostate biopsy using statistical image analysis. IEEE TMI, 26:779–788, 2007. 222222333422