cvpr cvpr2013 cvpr2013-83 cvpr2013-83-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Hang Chang, Alexander Borowsky, Paul Spellman, Bahram Parvin
Abstract: Image-based classification oftissue histology, in terms of different components (e.g., normal signature, categories of aberrant signatures), provides a series of indices for tumor composition. Subsequently, aggregation of these indices in each whole slide image (WSI) from a large cohort can provide predictive models of clinical outcome. However, the performance of the existing techniques is hindered as a result of large technical and biological variations that are always present in a large cohort. In this paper, we propose two algorithms for classification of tissue histology based on robust representations of morphometric context, which are built upon nuclear level morphometric features at various locations and scales within the spatial pyramid matching (SPM) framework. These methods have been evaluated on two distinct datasets of different tumor types collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and the experimental results indicate that our methods are (i) extensible to different tumor types; (ii) robust in the presence of wide technical and biological variations; (iii) invariant to different nuclear segmentation strategies; and (iv) scalable with varying training sample size. In addition, our experiments suggest that enforcing sparsity, during the construction of morphometric context, further improves the performance of the system.
[1] D. Axelrod, N. Miller, H. Lickley, J. Qian, W. ChristensBarry, Y. Yuan, Y. Fu, and J. Chapman. Effect of quantitative 222222000977
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5] nuclear features on recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ (dcis) of breast. In Cancer Informatics, 4:99–109, 2008. 2 R. Bhagavatula, M. Fickus, W. Kelly, C. Guo, J. Ozolek, C. Castro, and J. Kovacevic. Automatic identification and delineation of germ layer components in h&e; stained images of teratomas derived from human and nonhuman primate embryonic stem cells. In ISBI, pages 1041–1044, 2010. 2 O. Boiman, E. Shechtman, and M. Irani. In defense of nearest-neighbor based image classification. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1–8, 2008. 2 A. Bosch, A. Zisserman, and X. Mu˜ noz. Scene classification using a hybrid generative/discriminative approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30(4):712–727, Apr. 2008. 2 H. Chang, G. Fontenay, J. Han, G. Cong, F. Baehner, J. Gray, P. Spellman, and B. Parvin. Morphometric analysis ofTCGA Gliobastoma Multiforme. BMC Bioinformatics, 12(1), 2011. 4
[6] H. Chang, L. Loss, P. Spellman, A. Borowsky, and B. Parvin. Batch-invariant nuclear segmentation in whole mount histology sections. In ISBI, pages 856–859, 2012. 4, 6, 7
[7] L. Dalton, S. Pinder, C. Elston, I. Ellis, D. Page, W. Dupont,
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12] and R. Blamey. Histolgical gradings of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreements. Modern Pathology, 13(7):730–735, 2000. 1 C. Demir and B. Yener. Automated cancer diagnosis based on histopathological images: A systematic survey, 2009. 1 M. Elad and M. Aharon. Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(12):3736–3745, Dec. 2006. 2 M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2012 (VOC2012) Results. http://www.pascalnetwork.org/challenges/VOC/voc2012/workshop/index.html. 2 R.-E. Fan, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, X.-R. Wang, and C.-J. Lin. LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9: 1871–1874, 2008. 3 K. Grauman and T. Darrell. The pyramid match kernel: discriminative classification with sets of image features. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 1458 1465, 2005. 3 M. Gurcan, L. Boucheron, A. Can, A. Madabhushi, N. Rajpoot, and Y. Bulent. Histopathological image analysis: a review. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2: 147–171, 2009. 1 C. Huang, A. Veillard, N. Lomeine, D. Racoceanu, and L. Roux. Time efficient sparse analysis of histopathological whole slide images. Computerized medical imaging and graphics, 35(7-8):579–591, 2011. 2 K. Kavukcuoglu, M. Ranzato, and Y. LeCun. Fast infer–
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23] ence in sparse coding algorithms with applications to object recognition. Technical Report CBLL-TR-2008-12-01, Computational and Biological Learning Lab, Courant Institute, NYU, 2008. 7 J. Kong, L. Cooper, A. Sharma, T. Kurk, D. Brat, and J. Saltz. Texture based image recognition in microscopy images of diffuse gliomas with multi-class gentle boosting mechanism. In ICASSAP, pages 457–460, 2010. 2 S. Kothari, J. Phan, A. Osunkoya, and M. Wang. Biological interpretation of morphological patterns in histopathological whole slide images. In ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2012. 2, 6 S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2169–2178, 2006. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 Q. Le, J. Han, J. Gray, P. Spellman, A. Borowsky, and B. Parvin. Learning invariant features from tumor signature. In ISBI, pages 302–305, 2012. 2, 6 F.-F. Li and P. Perona. A bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 524–531, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. 2 J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, G. Sapiro, and A. Zisserman. Supervised dictionary learning. In NIPS, 2008. 7 F. Moosmann, B. Triggs, and F. Jurie. Randomized clustering forests for building fast and discriminative visual vocabularies. In NIPS, 2006. 2 N. Otsu. A threshold selection method from gray-level his-
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29] tograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9(1):62–66, 1979. 4 P. Quelhas, F. Monay, J.-M. Odobez, D. Gatica-Perez, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool. Modeling scenes with local descriptors and latent aspects. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV ’05, pages 883–890, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. 2 T. Serre, L. Wolf, and T. Poggio. Object recognition with features inspired by visual cortex. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 994–1000, 2005. 3 A. Vedaldi and A. Zisserman. Efficient additive kernels via explicit feature maps. IEEE Transactions on PatternAnalysis and Machine Intelligence, 34(3):480–492, 2012. 3 Q. Wen, H. Chang, and B. Parvin. A Delaunay triangulation approach for segmenting clumps of nuclei. In ISBI, pages 9–12, 2009. 4 J. Yang, K. Yu, Y. Gong, and T. Huang. Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1794–1801, 2009. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 R. A. Young and R. M. Lesperance. The gaussian derivative model for spatial-temporal vision. I. Cortical Model. Spatial Vision, 2001:3–4, 2001. 4 222222001088