cvpr cvpr2013 cvpr2013-35 cvpr2013-35-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Oren Barkan, Jonathan Weill, Amir Averbuch, Shai Dekel
Abstract: One of the main challenges in Computed Tomography (CT) is how to balance between the amount of radiation the patient is exposed to during scan time and the quality of the CT image. We propose a mathematical model for adaptive CT acquisition whose goal is to reduce dosage levels while maintaining high image quality at the same time. The adaptive algorithm iterates between selective limited acquisition and improved reconstruction, with the goal of applying only the dose level required for sufficient image quality. The theoretical foundation of the algorithm is nonlinear Ridgelet approximation and a discrete form of Ridgelet analysis is used to compute the selective acquisition steps that best capture the image edges. We show experimental results where for the same number of line projections, the adaptive model produces higher image quality, when compared with standard limited angle, non-adaptive acquisition algorithms.
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7] D. Brenner, C. Ellison, E. Hall and W. Berdon, Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from Pediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 176 (2001), 289-296. C. McCollough, M. Bruesewitz and J. Kofler, CT Dose Reduction and Dose Management Tools: Overview of Available Options, Radiographics 26 (2006), 503-5 12. A. Delaney and Y. Bresler, Globally Convergent EdgePreserving Regularized Reconstruction: An Application to Limited-Angle Tomography, IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 7 (1998), 204-221. J. Thibault, K. Sauer, C. Bouman and J. Hsieh, A threedimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT, Med. Phys. 34 (2007), 4526-4544. E. Candès, Ridgelets: Theory and applications, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1998. “MBIR aims to outshine ASIR for sharpness, CT dose reduction”, article in AuntMinnie, 18th May, 2010. D. Kolditz, Y. Kyriakou and W. Kalender, Volume-ofinterest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose, Medical Physics 37 (2010), 2719-2730.
[8] J. Moore, H. Barret and L. Furenlid, Adaptive CT for highresolution, controlled-dose, region-of-interest imaging, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp Conf. (2009), 4154-4157.
[9] B. Rutt, Scanned projection radiography using high speed computed tomographic scanning system, U.S Patent 4,573,179.
[10] T. Quinto, Singularities of the X-ray transform and limited ?2
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19] ?3 data tomography in and , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 24(1993), 1215-1225. Compressive Sensing Resources home page: http://dsp.rice.edu/cs . C.Li, Compressive Sensing for 3D Data Processing Tasks: Applications, Models and Algorithms, Ph.D. thesis, Rice University, April 201 1. TVAL3 homepage : http://www.caam.rice.edu/~optimization/L1/TVAL3/ B. De Man and S. Basu. Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions. Phys. Med. Biol., 49 (2004), 2463-75. S.Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Third Edition: The Sparse Way, 3rd edition, Academic Press, 2009. M. N. Do and M. Vetterli, The Finite Ridgelet transform for image representation, IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 12 (2003), 16-28. J.Hsieh, Computed Tomography, principles, design, artifacts and recent advances, second edition, 2009. I. Zubal, C. Harrell, E. Smith, Z. Rattner, G. Gindi, and P. Hoffer, Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy, Med. Phys. 21(1994), 299-302. Y.Mao, B.P. Fahimian, S. J. Osher, and J. Miao,
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23] Development and optimization of regularized tomographic reconstruction algorithms, IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 19 (2010), 1259-1268. R. Nelson, Thousands of new cancers predicted due to increased use of CT, Medscape news, December 17, 2009. I. Shuryak, R. Sachs and D. Brenner, Cancer Risks after Radiation Exposure in Middle Age, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102 (2010), 1606-1609. E. Candes, J. Romberg, and T. Tao, “Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 489–509, 2006. J. Frikel, A new framework for sparse regularization in limited angle x-ray tomography, Proc. IEEE conf. biomedical imaging 2010, 824-827. 222222000200